Identify Regarding Books Film as Art
Title | : | Film as Art |
Author | : | Rudolf Arnheim |
Book Format | : | Paperback |
Book Edition | : | 50th Anniversary Printing |
Pages | : | Pages: 238 pages |
Published | : | March 6th 2006 by University of California Press (first published 1932) |
Categories | : | Culture. Film. Art. Nonfiction. Philosophy. Theory |
Rudolf Arnheim
Paperback | Pages: 238 pages Rating: 3.86 | 341 Users | 20 Reviews
Chronicle In Favor Of Books Film as Art
In the fall of 1957 the University of California Press expanded Arnheim’s 1933 book Film by four essays and brought that landmark work back into print as Film as Art. Now nearly fifty years after that re-edition, the book continues to occupy an important place in the literature of film. Arnheim’s method, provocative in this age of technological wizardry, was to focus on the way art in film was derived from that medium’s early limitations: no sound, no color, no three-dimensional depth.Describe Books In Pursuance Of Film as Art
Original Title: | Film als Kunst |
ISBN: | 0520248376 (ISBN13: 9780520248373) |
Edition Language: | English |
Rating Regarding Books Film as Art
Ratings: 3.86 From 341 Users | 20 ReviewsJudgment Regarding Books Film as Art
Arnheim's anatomical survey of how film form differs perceptually from the then-hegemonic contention that "film is a mechanical reproduction of reality" merits some praise for its counter-hypothesis to realist film theory. Regardless, he makes generalized statements about what constitutes an 'art'. He also relies heavily on assumptions of what the future cinema might entail - this leads him to make false claims about the (lack of) artistic merits of sound film, colour film, 3D film, and otherI had to read this for a class, and I made it a little over halfway through, but it's so wordy and heavy that it's hard to understand. Not to mention some of the content is more than outdated now.
Great resource and read even today. Made me revisit some gorgeous old film.
Dove andava il cinema ? Raccolta eterogenea di scritti dello psicologo della Gestalt, che vanno dal '32 al '38 (quindi dai 28 ai 34 anni dell'autore). L'importanza di questo testo è nota e la difficoltà di lettura (Arnheim è estremamente analitico nella sua descrizione del processo filmico e adora le schematizzazioni e le categorizzazioni) è ripagata da alcune intuizioni davvero felici ed interessanti.In particolare, mi conforta sapere che già agli albori del cinema c'era chi incoraggiava lo
Some of the things Arnheim put out may have been outdated, but it is really nice to revisit some of the classic sentiments from the art of film. It actually gives me a fresh perspective, especially if I'm thinking about making a movie myself.
Only read assigned chunks of this, but what I did read nudged my perceptions of film. Although older and a little dated, it pushes the casual movie viewers perceptions into directions that change how we view movies in general...
Every truth Arnheim presents concerning the nature of film as art (and there are many) is nonetheless irreconcilably tainted with a lament of color and sound in film, thereby attacking progress in the beginning of the book, where he later praises progress that led to the development of film in a later chapter.
0 Comments:
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.